Many Questions!

 CAN SCIENCE INVESTIGATE SUPERNATURAL?

 Majority of national science people and science organizations have been declared that deep discussions in limited science on processes and natural phenomenon. As example, US National Science Academic said "Science is a method to described world in natural. Discussions that given only limit to natural world through approaches which is natural. Science never could touch, we called supernatural world. Science neutral's position to the problem of existences of God. 

 Scientist and science organizations put this science approaches into natural limit scope without realized has been declared that science's approach is natural dogmatic approach. In every single books have been published in 1990s, law professor Philip Johnson argued that doctrine which is say that if natural is everything in this whole world, is a kind of assumption can not be indisputable which is underlie not just natural knowledge but all of intellectual activities. in every chances, public debates that we see till today, science with its dogma always in refute positions possibility there is non natural process roles which is manage this universe. 

 Remembering many scientist's positions and organizations, Johnson and his supporters have tons of strong reasons to tell that sciences are dogmatic materialistic. Even though, we know that dogmatic is an anti thesis for science. In as long as science history, from Copernicus and Galileo till now, there are lots of samples that is dogmatism does not have place in this scientific world. 

 What has showed in the history is science according to many things and not just accept that new ideas which is offered by other people easily. New claims should be supported by lots of datas, especially when this new ideas are contradicting related to established knowledge. Scientists in all researches fields will say to you that finding something new not just easily things. They need to convincing many colleagues who play a role as enthusiastic objector and the results of the research still need to pass review process again with some independent experts till finally it published. While the scientists express their refutation to claimed there are existence evidences there is the greatest designer of this universe, they are not putting their self in dogmatic position. they are just applying equal standard when they face with other amazing claims. For that big claims, they sue big evidences too.

 Other than that, for reason what many scientists refused an idea there is the greatest designer or other supernatural phenomenons that imagine if there are datas good enough to attracted? Many scientist will feel so happy as is field for new research who can invite many research funding supports. In reality, we will need to see later that an idea about the greatest designer this universe today not present any evidences or anything about theoretical ideas that can draw attentions. 

 Even more, we know that opinion which is said that science can not touch supernatural issues and supernatural hypothesis can not be tested is not true statement. In fact, many famous scientists with their capabilities can investigate the probabilities of supernatural world's existence. Big institutions like Mayo Clinic, Harvard University, and Duke University are investigating non material phenomenon's existence in this universe. Many experiments that they're done designed to investigate the power of prayer from far away to healed the sickness. Their research's result published in journals (medical journal).

 Unfortunately, literature is about power of pray that has bad qualities, because experimental designed is bad too. However, by reading the best scientific creation published from famous organizations, you can see how science methodology works with the right way. If the creation is still can called something scientific, I dont know what we need to do. 

 Agreement is that science has scope limitations in discussions just to investigate through objective observation and find the reason or explanation to natural approaches we called methodology naturalism. 

 Naturalism's methodology rules can be apply regardless from metaphysical naturalism dogmas. The statement can be thesis is that God hypothesis can be investigate, can be verify, and falsification using standard scientific methods. All of phenomenons that we could imagine if we observed using naturalism methodology rules, will open the probabilities that there is reality or fact it can be not consistent with metaphysical naturalism rules. 

 For example, maybe in one sample experiment which is designed in detail, we could get the conclusion that really significance in statistic and can be replicate about the power of pray in Catholic religion or believers who can heal certain sickness for temporarily, than pray from other religions not. Its hard to imagine that result of research (hypothesis) like this way, sue the natural discussions or statements that make sense. 

Book Source : Metode Saintifik Menalar Tuhan

Subscribe to receive free email updates: